Wednesday, December 31, 2025

How Do I Stop Summarising and Start Synthesising? Top Tips to Keep You on Track in 2026

How Do You Stop Summarising and Start Synthesising? 

This is an excellent question. And a very fair one. Research textbooks, advisors, the handy checklists and self-study videos – all of them will tell you that a literature review must synthesise previous sources, not summarise them. 

Fine. But how do you do that? Advice on this is harder to find, leaving many of us tearing our hair out in frustration. I know that’s how I felt, back when I was surrounded by piles of papers and stacks of notes and wondering what on earth I was supposed to be doing with it all. 

That’s why I’m dedicating this blog, the first of 2026, to the how in how to stop summarising and start synthesising. 


But First, Some Preliminaries

Summarising is what happens if you describe individual studies one at a time (this study said this; that study showed that). This doesn’t put anything new in the world – it only reports on information that already exists. Synthesis, in contrast, is all about finding patterns in previous research and coming to grips with what those patterns reveal about your research question and why it should be asked. To synthesise, you need to take a good hard look at the findings from previous studies on your topic and figure out how they relate to each other – what story they tell about the direction of travel in your field and what impact your research question will have on that direction. 

You are not describing studies one at a time. You are analysing the findings from those studies to uncover relevant patterns. In your literature review, finding these patterns and setting out your account of why they matter is part of how you make your original contribution. A synthesis puts something new in the world; a summary describes what is already there. 

Getting Down to Brass Tacks

So how exactly do you go about doing this synthesis thing? First, isolate all the findings. I do this by quoting or paraphrasing each finding on individual note cards, one finding per card, each with an author/year/page attribution. Remember that one study might have multiple findings, so you need a card for each finding, not a card for each study. You can do this in batches as you proceed through your reading, updating as you go. But for each batch, you probably need 25-30 findings to start tracing out meaningful patterns. 

Looking for personalised help with the ins and outs of synthesis? Book on to one of my How to Really Write Your Literature Review workshops. For an evening session on January 13th, click here. For a morning session on January 16th, click here (all times are GMT; workshops are online via Zoom).

Once you’ve liberated the findings from the matrix of the studies so that you can concentrate on them, start your search for patterns. The best way to do this is by asking questions. 

The specific questions you ask will depend on your particular research area, but here are 12 examples to get you started, one for each month of our glorious New Year πŸ₯³

  1. Which of the findings are broadly in agreement?

Tuesday, December 2, 2025

Feeling Overwhelmed by Your Literature Review? This January 2026 Workshop Is For You

The Holiday Season Is Approaching Fast!

The winter break is nearly here. Classes finish soon, the marking will eventually be completed – if you’re doing any – your admin tasks will stay done for a while, and the meeting invites will slow to a trickle. At least for a bit (!!) 

And you’ll have what every research writer wants: clear, unbroken time to sit down and finally make some progress. It's the perfect opportunity to dig into your literature review, to ‘locate your work in the context of your field’ and all that. 

“There’s plenty of training for methodology and methods. But for the literature review? Somehow, you’re just supposed to know about that, without much training.” 

Excellent! But how will you go about doing that, exactly? You start going through your notes. You’ve got piles of stuff on methodology and methods, pages and pages on analysis, and a whole separate notebook on ethics. But for your literature review? Hmm. There was an assigned chapter from one of the textbooks, and a self-study tutorial with a handy checklist: Don’t describe studies. Critically evaluate. Sectionise your review. Don’t summarise, synthesise

Not bad advice, as far as it goes. You should be critically evaluating instead of describing, synthesising instead of summarising, and eventually your literature review will need subheadings. But there’s not much how in the how-to here. There's plenty of material and help to be had on methodology and methods. But the literature review? Somehow, you’re just supposed to know that – without much actual training. 

How to Really Write Your Literature Review: A Lifeline 

That’s why I created How to Really Write Your Literature Review, for researchers just like you who may be feeling overwhelmed and confused by this thing called ‘the literature review’.

“If you like the content of this blog, now you can get even more great advice in my workshop, 'How to Really Write Your Literature Review.' Join me and dig into what the guidebooks leave out.” 

In this workshop, I cut through all the confusion and show you what you really need to know to write your literature review. You’ll learn how to: 

  • Break out of the description trap
  • Turn a pile of notes into a case for your research question 
  • Move from critiquing single studies to analysing a body of scholarship 
  • Identify patterns and trends in previous research (spotting that mysterious ‘gap’) 
  • Use these patterns and trends as evidence in your argument 
  • Organise and rhetorically craft your review 

“The approachable, informal delivery meant that we moved from basic concepts to tackling review ourselves without a bump in the road” – Iain Rowan, Academic Registrar

Spaces are Limited So Book Your Place Now 

Don’t let frustration derail your dissertation. Book your place now and keep your work on track with How to Really Write Your Literature Review. You can book a session in the morning or the evening, whichever suits your schedule or time zone. 

Lasting Value 

For the price of the workshop, you also get a bundle of freebies to support you as you put what you've learned into practice. 

  • Access to up to 3 Zoom drop-in sessions with me for follow-up questions
  • A PDF with answers to FAQs, such as 'How do I know when I’m finished?' 
  • A learners’ pack outlining the techniques introduced for future reference

πŸ”—Know anyone else who might be interested? Please share this blog to your network. 

Your Blog Author and Workshop Deliverer 

Dr Susan Mandala is founding director of Writing Works Consulting. She holds a PhD from the University of Cambridge and was for many years an academic at the University of Sunderland, where one of her favourite roles was training PhD candidates to write literature reviews. A specialist in the study of language, writing, and style, she has 30 years of experience as an educator, trainer, and workshop facilitator. 

“Susan is a great teacher and this clear and well-structured workshop really helped to give me the confidence to move forward with my research” – Jane Pickthall 

Want More Information Before You Book? 

I look forward to hearing from you! 😊

How Do I Stop Summarising and Start Synthesising? Top Tips to Keep You on Track in 2026

How Do You Stop Summarising and Start Synthesising?  This is an excellent question. And a very fair one. Research textbooks, advisors, the h...